View Full Version : RIP Stephen Hawking
~RustyGunZ~
03-14-2018, 12:24 AM
shitty day
Elemental P
03-14-2018, 12:29 AM
That really sucks
Kid Sick
03-14-2018, 12:35 AM
The thing about smart people is that they seem like crazy people to dumb people.
uh-oh
03-14-2018, 06:31 AM
i disagree with his lifes work
he also became a doddering bitter old fool in his later years
since he was disabled and had an iq of 160 he was overrated
rip
Witty
03-14-2018, 08:24 AM
What do you mean you disagree on his life's work?
Enbombz
03-14-2018, 08:25 AM
Not everyone's life work can be as meaningful as yours uh oh.
Ghost1
03-14-2018, 08:27 AM
What do you mean you disagree on his life's work?
LMFAO pls don't
I choked after reading this lololol
COSMOLOGY IS A HOAX
stay tuned for blue collar explanations founded in wiggery and dementia
uh-oh
03-14-2018, 09:24 AM
Black holes emmitting radiation, them being mystical points of space turning in on themselves etc
If any of you were scientifically literate youd know all these points are debated.
My personal unfounded belief is it is just a super dense undocumented element thats mass nothing can escape from, not radiation or anything. Its never been recorded that energy escapes them be it radiation or anything and he uses shitty basic equations in relation to the early days of the big bang to back his theory
He could be correct, but he never really did anything. Its like praising michio kaku for string theory
This nigga dawkins was a critic of the particle accelerator and ate his words through a feeding tube in his belly button after they found the higgs boson
Fuck him lol
Black holes emmitting radiation, them being mystical points of space turning in on themselves etc
If any of you were scientifically literate youd know all these points are debated.
My personal unfounded belief is it is just a super dense undocumented element thats mass nothing can escape from, not radiation or anything. Its never been recorded that energy escapes them be it radiation or anything and he uses shitty basic equations in relation to the early days of the big bang to back his theory
He could be correct, but he never really did anything. Its like praising michio kaku for string theory
This nigga dawkins was a critic of the particle accelerator and ate his words through a feeding tube in his belly button after they found the higgs boson
Fuck him lol
Don't make this thread about you and your 9th grade education belief system. You want to use his death to talk shot about him? I might pull up on you I'll be in Cleveland in August for a conference.
Elemental P
03-14-2018, 09:58 AM
A lot of his theories aren't proved wrong either we just don't have the right technology to prove them. I actually read about science topics a lot. And were it not for Hawkins theories etc I seriously doubt we would be as advanced as we are now. Anything is open to debate. Some people think we live in a fucking alien simulator and other fucking idiots think the earth is still flat and gravity doesn't exist lol staahp it. And string theory is intriguing, along with M Theory. Just b.c you didn't agree with his theories doesn't make him wrong lol.
~RustyGunZ~
03-14-2018, 10:12 AM
i disagree with his lifes work
he also became a doddering bitter old fool in his later years
since he was disabled and had an iq of 160 he was overrated
rip
The thing about smart people is that they seem like crazy people to dumb people.
QFE
Barcotic
03-14-2018, 11:15 AM
i got a lethal tommy, but lets see the shotty fare
the steel will transport this crooked man -stephen hawking's chair
Destroyer
03-14-2018, 11:17 AM
Dude was only 34 years older than me... damn
Suthaveli
03-14-2018, 11:33 AM
Don't make this thread about you and your 9th grade education belief system. You want to use his death to talk shot about him? I might pull up on you I'll be in Cleveland in August for a conference.
Shleep! Ctfu
Suthaveli
03-14-2018, 11:33 AM
Dude was only 34 years older than me... damn
Lmfao
R.i.p. tho
uh-oh
03-14-2018, 12:01 PM
I DID 9TH GRADE TWICE
JOKES ON YOU YA SLOPE
Damn. Shawshank redemption was my favourite film. The IT remake was dope too
Barcotic
03-14-2018, 12:35 PM
Damn. Shawshank redemption was my favourite film. The IT remake was dope too
lmaooo
Heard about this at work last night. Fucking shame man. He was THAT guy
Ghost1
03-14-2018, 01:24 PM
Damn. Shawshank redemption was my favourite film. The IT remake was dope too
gonee
Witty
03-14-2018, 01:49 PM
Uh-oh did not call me scientifically illiterate. Wait til I finish work and I'm going innnn.
big baby
03-14-2018, 02:47 PM
itt toothless assistant mechanic from bumblefuck ohio aims to explain y renowned physicist is wrong on his werk lmao fucka idiyote
uh-oh
03-14-2018, 05:34 PM
yea i DUNNO
pretty sure i bodied his existence and made it irrelevant
you guys probably never even looked into anything he did and just know him from pop culture as a celebrated genius.
but he's only a celebrated genius cuz he was a crippled goober
Witty
03-14-2018, 07:49 PM
yea i DUNNO
pretty sure i bodied his existence and made it irrelevant
you guys probably never even looked into anything he did and just know him from pop culture as a celebrated genius.
but he's only a celebrated genius cuz he was a crippled goober
No he was a celebrated genius because he was a certified genius. People go too far comparing him to the likes of Einstein or Newton, because that is a different level of genius all together, but Hawking was without doubt a genius.
I'm disappointed you think I would attempt to engage in a discussion about something in which I am not well versed. I am very aware of Hawking's life work. He showed that the universe began with a singularity, he pretty much single handedly unravelled the mystery of black holes, made huge strides in unifying quantum physics and general relativity, along with a few other theories, which scientists had been struggling to do for decades, and helped us understand the big bang theory from a quantum standpoint, amongst many other ideas and hypotheses which while unproven, have solid foundations and are intriguing. I think you are taking the fact that he was wrong about a few things and coming up with the idea he was basically a mascot for physics, which is just untrue...he was an incredibly clever man, with a life's work many of his peers would envy.
Witty
03-14-2018, 07:53 PM
That Higgs Boson moment was possibly his biggest mistake, either that or his idea that information can be destroyed in a black hole. But even the greatest minds of all time make mistakes. Einstein certainly did. It does not make him any less of a genius.
uh-oh
03-14-2018, 08:06 PM
No he was a celebrated genius because he was a certified genius. People go too far comparing him to the likes of Einstein or Newton, because that is a different level of genius all together, but Hawking was without doubt a genius.
I'm disappointed you think I would attempt to engage in a discussion about something in which I am not well versed. I am very aware of Hawking's life work. He showed that the universe began with a singularity, he pretty much single handedly unravelled the mystery of black holes, made huge strides in unifying quantum physics and general relativity, along with a few other theories, which scientists had been struggling to do for decades, and helped us understand the big bang theory from a quantum standpoint, amongst many other ideas and hypotheses which while unproven, have solid foundations and are intriguing. I think you are taking the fact that he was wrong about a few things and coming up with the idea he was basically a mascot for physics, which is just untrue...he was an incredibly clever man, with a life's work many of his peers would envy.
he attached his name to his peers "lifes works"
i wasn't taking a shot at you saying you are scientifically illiterate lol, i was saying anyone who doesn't realize the things he stands by are heavily debated, amongst PEERS, other physicists etc. none of it is AS set in stone (for lack of a better saying) like things einstein and newton put down. its super theoretical physics, but more in the non scientific definition of the word theory, since even with advanced mathematics alot of it doesn't check out
you bring up him merging the worlds of quantum physics and general relativity, but he used models utilizing the most basic aspects/not accounting for every variable to push it through back in the 70s. he gained notoriety from doing so, but again it was heavily and still is debated because when you take variables left out and add them in it tends to fall apart
it was all in relation to his theory of black holes emitting radiation. he just on a whim decided they do. then he built all the equations to support his theory.
so when looking at it, its a "yea that very well could be true" the math adds up.
but there is no way to actually quantify and test his theories lol.
also i am trolling. i can't respect a man that can't wipe the drool off his own chin. of course i can. but where is the fun in that. i'd rather pick apart his flaws and have a few entertaining fleeting moments on NC. mostly because i did alot of getting high and watching what i deem space shit, and actually learning about the lot of these nerds. so when someone sees stephen hawkings' name they just know from pop culture oh he's that genius guy who talks with a robot voice. but don't actually know what he did
uh-oh
03-14-2018, 08:09 PM
That Higgs Boson moment was possibly his biggest mistake, either that or his idea that information can be destroyed in a black hole. But even the greatest minds of all time make mistakes. Einstein certainly did. It does not make him any less of a genius.
he was as flawed as anyone, and stuck with his biases like everyone does.
his whole theory on black holes relies upon viewing it from his perspective. and the thing with these far flung theoretical physics theories, are they can make sense when viewed from a certain angle. but a simple shift in vantage and it unravels.
his job was to make sure your vantage didn't shift. because he explained it already. PHOOEY if it doesn't make sense how you observe it. you obviously aren't observing it correctly.
uh-oh
03-14-2018, 09:54 PM
he attached his name to his peers "lifes works"
i wasn't taking a shot at you saying you are scientifically illiterate lol, i was saying anyone who doesn't realize the things he stands by are heavily debated, amongst PEERS, other physicists etc. none of it is AS set in stone (for lack of a better saying) like things einstein and newton put down. its super theoretical physics, but more in the non scientific definition of the word theory, since even with advanced mathematics alot of it doesn't check out
you bring up him merging the worlds of quantum physics and general relativity, but he used models utilizing the most basic aspects/not accounting for every variable to push it through back in the 70s. he gained notoriety from doing so, but again it was heavily and still is debated because when you take variables left out and add them in it tends to fall apart
it was all in relation to his theory of black holes emitting radiation. he just on a whim decided they do. then he built all the equations to support his theory.
so when looking at it, its a "yea that very well could be true" the math adds up.
but there is no way to actually quantify and test his theories lol.
also i am trolling. i can't respect a man that can't wipe the drool off his own chin. of course i can. but where is the fun in that. i'd rather pick apart his flaws and have a few entertaining fleeting moments on NC. mostly because i did alot of getting high and watching what i deem space shit, and actually learning about the lot of these nerds. so when someone sees stephen hawkings' name they just know from pop culture oh he's that genius guy who talks with a robot voice. but don't actually know what he did
this was a terrible post.
the person who typed it is illiterate and incapable of structuring coherent thoughts in sentence form.
RIP hawking.
Lyfzaa Gamble
03-15-2018, 03:40 AM
Rip
vBulletin® v3.8.5, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.