so the moon is in our atmosphere

[Chyeahhh!!!]

Had not seen any threads on it. Any thoughts

[PancakeBrah]

Hadn't really thought much about it. What could it mean?

[Adonis]

They do say that the Moon came from us. I saw a documentary on it. A massive collision occured and split off a large shard of Earth, and a bunch of dust and other material. This was the same collision that gave us an Axis to our rotation, it sort of wobbles instead of spins perfectly. Cuz Earth is egg shaped, it originally spun in a pure circle until it was shifted just a bit. Anyways, then all the dust and space matter was obviously pulled by the piece of Earth that was broken off, the gravity of it anyways, and eventually formed the moon.

Fun fact, the moon actually is getting further away from the earth by milimeters every year, so so eventually our tides would be fucked after it moves too far.

[superboy estar legend]

some ppl say that the moon is what's left of the old earth before humanity nuked itself to extinction, and was left there for us to learn from

[Sharp]

some ppl say that the moon is what's left of the old earth before humanity nuked itself to extinction, and was left there for us to learn from

No one says that

[superboy estar legend]

nuke yourself

[PancakeBrah]

Yeah no the moon is from when the dinosaur meteor hit us. Chunk.

Some say parts of the moon have always been in our atmosphere actually.

[Blas]

nuke yourself

don't worry the guys a fucking faggot he's the laughing stock of netcees.org taha

[bleak]

Wasn't earth created by a collision of 2 "planets" called Earth 1 and Earth 2 ?

Also did you know that no one knows who originally named our planets, and they are finding ancient documents that have in depth knowledge of the solar system? This was before telescopes and shit or any real astronomy

[zelti]

nuke yourself

[PancakeBrah]

Wasn't earth created by a collision of 2 "planets" called Earth 1 and Earth 2 ?

Also did you know that no one knows who originally named our planets, and they are finding ancient documents that have in depth knowledge of the solar system? This was before telescopes and shit or any real astronomy

1. Yup

2. Yup

[superboy estar legend]

standard stories about the formation and existence are boring, but here's an interesting one. did you guys know about NASA's attempt to collide Apollo 12 into the moon, and to study the geological effect on it? (seismic activity)

Well it produced stunning results, after surveying seismic activity of the moon after the impact, they reported that the moon vibrated and "rang like a bell" for at least an hour.

this happened sometime in the 1970s i belie.ve

edit:
this caused speculation that the moon could be hollow, or have a unique structure.

[Adonis]

So, its Swiss cheese then cuz it's hollow right?

We are all collectively a fairly impressive science wizz

[boof]

nice

[Suthaveli]

No one says that

^I was just about to say this

But nuke yourself floored me. Rofls

[bleak]

They weren't colliding Apollo 12 with the moon lol

They sent the landing modules back down after disembarking

[superboy estar legend]

the first time someone told me about the bell story i was told nasa straight up hit the moon with a missile xD

edit: thank u for clarifying

[Sharp]

They wouldn't wanna nuke the moon again

[Destroyer]

1. The moon didn’t ring like a bell
2. It’s always been in our atmosphere
3. Chyeahhh fell way the fuck off

[Ghost1]

no one says that and nuke yourself got me fucked up tho LOL

[~RustyGunZ~]

It’s just a projection on the dome so who cares?

Some dumby zoomed in on the feedback for a second

[uh-oh]

Everyone knows the moon was put there to persecute christians

[Destroyer]

Must spread. Fuck

[Blas]

nuke yourselves

[~RustyGunZ~]

Everyone knows the moon was put there to persecute christians

God put it there to test our faith

[Diode]

is this the dawning of the age of aquarius

age of aquarius

aquariuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuus

a-qua-ri-ussssssss?

[Master Rock]

I found this as interesting information when it was release. Like a couple of weeks ago I believe, but yet it leaves me wondering why is this information coming out now? Also, does that mean that we are in space and the whole atmosphere around us is space? And it leads you to question what is space? But not only about space but leads to more questions such as is the moon underneath the firmament? Also, is there an agenda to all this? The list can go on.

[Geno]

Wasn't earth created by a collision of 2 "planets" called Earth 1 and Earth 2 ?

Also did you know that no one knows who originally named our planets, and they are finding ancient documents that have in depth knowledge of the solar system? This was before telescopes and shit or any real astronomy



Link to these findings?

[bleak]

https://www.ancient-code.com/this-ancient-sumerian-cylinder-seal-is-said-to-depict-12-planets-in-our-solar-system/

They even got the sizes right and mention a rogue planet which we have known of now for years. However they weren't supposed to know this shit back then lol.

Alexandria

[uh-oh]

https://www.ancient-code.com/this-ancient-sumerian-cylinder-seal-is-said-to-depict-12-planets-in-our-solar-system/

They even got the sizes right and mention a rogue planet which we have known of now for years. However they weren't supposed to know this shit back then lol.

Alexandria

thats all sitchin stuff tho. its even refuted in what you linked

the ancients definitely knew alot though. its like the flat earth myth. i'm honestly baffled we were taught that they thought the earth was flat. literally no one thought that lol. columbus didn't even think that. his whole plan was to hit india because the earth is a sphere. they had other myths of krakens and deep sea monsters + the fact that by all calculations they thought there was no north/south america, they basically envisioned the atlantic/pacific as the same body of water.

but yea all of sitchins work is pure malarkey. it caught on because he's one of the few who could allegedly decode the sumerian scripts and such, but he just made his own shit up about it. everyone with any knowledge on it sees him as a doofus/fake

[bleak]

Beyond that tho, you can't refute their model of the solar system. That's beyond interpretation by Sitchin, it's a fact.

[~RustyGunZ~]

Man if you guys spent all the time you do researching this dumb horseshit learning real skills..

[uh-oh]

thats whats being refuted though, it doesnt depict the sun, and pluto isn't a planet and never shouldve been classified as one in the first place, which is why it isnt anymore.

there are literally dozens of plutos in reality, and planet x has never existed and never been proven to exist. so its literally all refuted lol

[bleak]

thats whats being refuted though, it doesnt depict the sun, and pluto isn't a planet and never shouldve been classified as one in the first place, which is why it isnt anymore.

there are literally dozens of plutos in reality, and planet x has never existed and never been proven to exist. so its literally all refuted lol

How is that not the sun in the picture? It is a ball with rays coming off it

[bleak]

Man if you guys spent all the time you do researching this dumb horseshit learning real skills..

I've learned my one skill in life, the rest will be invested into useless refutable information

[Sharp]

Man if you guys spent all the time you do researching this dumb horseshit learning real skills..

Like coding?

Maybe coding a game??

Maybe a specific game???

[uh-oh]

How is that not the sun in the picture? It is a ball with rays coming off itthats how they depicted stars, the sun was depicted similarly but with wavy lines and encased in a circle.

this breaks it down thoroughly

http://www.michaelsheiser.com/VA243seal.pdf

with pictures and everything, even reliefs depicting the sun next to the star symbol further showcasing the differences. its also the 243 seal that sitchin is pointing too, out of hundreds, he used a single one to try and prove a make believe point lol.

[bleak]

So they didn't know that the sun was a star?

[uh-oh]

i don't pretend to know what they knew. im just saying the evidence that they knew of the sun and all the planets + pluto + a make believe planet is superbly weak. espescially considering the source claiming that that is what is being depicted is the same guy that made up that 12th planet, and took one cylindrical image out of hundreds to try and prove it while using false knowledge of the time lol.

im usually arguing the ancients knew wayyyyyyy more than most give them credit. its just this specific thing i can't get behind. all the evidence points to disprove it.

[Vulgar]

When the ancients looked up at the stars, we had the prototype space agencies already in place.

[~RustyGunZ~]

Like coding?

Maybe coding a game??

Maybe a specific game???

#learntocode

[Exis]

Hasn't the moon been around for eons after Earth crashed in2 some Mars like shit? I didn't read thru the 3 pages of nonsense here, just heard that somewhere...?

[Chill Phil]

I've heard that a lot of physicists and astrophysicists agree that the moon doesn't belong where it is. And by not belong I mean, mathematically shouldn't be where it is. Plus the fact that it orbits Earth and rotates in a manner that keeps one side of itself facing Earth is suspicious.

[Chyeahhh!!!]

lotta good stuff here guys. Carry on

[Split Eight]

No one says that

I say that

[bleak]

Must be hallucinating ill be back tomorrow

[Sharp]

nuke yourself

[veritas]

Quantum of consciousness

[uh-oh]

i was eating a salami sandwich looking at the moon last night contemplating why mustard makes certain deli meats pop. i couldn't come to any conclusion other than the atmospheric pressure the moon puts on mustard plants during the younger dryus period of their evolution when jesus made the dinosaurs averse to their smell so they wouldn't predate them. giraffes are dope.

[~RustyGunZ~]

i was eating a salami sandwich looking at the moon last night contemplating why mustard makes certain deli meats pop. i couldn't come to any conclusion other than the atmospheric pressure the moon puts on mustard plants during the younger dryus period of their evolution when jesus made the dinosaurs averse to their smell so they wouldn't predate them. giraffes are dope.

Different mustard pairs better with different meats

Finally I know why. The moon!

[Eŋg]

some ppl say that the moon is what's left of the old earth before humanity nuked itself to extinction, and was left there for us to learn from

strong devilman crybaby spoiler.

[Exis]

Lol...

Apparently the whole Earth is flat, Like Netcees dot fuckin' org.

[Destroyer]

Everyone knows the moon is over my hammy
Fucking morans

[veritas]

I have been researching this. There is something wrong with the world.

[Diode]

Plus the fact that it orbits Earth and rotates in a manner that keeps one side of itself facing Earth is suspicious.

what is suspicious about a core tenet of astrophysics that is clearly seen and replicated within our own damned solar system?

tidal locking. learn it.

and appreciate it - without it, humans would never have evolved into the dominant life form.

[Destroyer]

Stop with your facts and logic bro
We’ll have none of that here

[~RustyGunZ~]

what is suspicious about a core tenet of astrophysics that is clearly seen and replicated within our own damned solar system?

tidal locking. learn it.

and appreciate it - without it, humans would never have evolved into the dominant life form.

veritas do you have any links to dispute this? perhaps from a flatearth organization for a very unbiased view???

[veritas]

If the moon effects the oceans why does it not affect the lakes?

[Destroyer]

It does?

[uh-oh]

Lmaoooo

[Diode]

If the moon effects the oceans why does it not affect the lakes?

It does though?

https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/gltides.html

[veritas]

It does?
I don’t see people surfing lakes?

Is it easier to move one pound or ten pounds?

[~RustyGunZ~]

https://cdn.drawception.com/drawings/B64JOPgaTZ.png

[veritas]

It does though?

https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/gltides.html

It says they are non tidal lol. Bias bias unreliable source lol. The NOAA is sponsored by NASA and the shadow government

[veritas]

https://cdn.drawception.com/drawings/B64JOPgaTZ.png

Would you be willing to send me some psilocybin in the mail?

[Diode]

It says they are non tidal lol. Bias bias unreliable source lol. The NOAA is sponsored by NASA and the shadow government

going to ignore your willfull ignorance re: NOAA and NASA and whatever other tinfoil you have on today.

... because the shift is 5cm, as opposed to an ocean which has much greater volume, and is thus much more affected by the gravity of the sun and the moon.

or do we also not believe in gravity in your creationist world?

[veritas]

I am an evolutionist. I keep telling People this and they never ask me about it.

It just seems counter intuitive. It is easier to escape the side control of a featherweight than an ultraweavy weoght using the same force.


I know this seems stupid but it is a fair common sense question:

Hey moon, how come you come you act stronger on the ocean then you do on the lake or stream.


Fair?

[veritas]

Also... concerning the moon:


Why are the craters perfectly round.
How as Nixon able to call the moon and our cellphones can’t work in elevators?

[Diode]

I am an evolutionist. I keep telling People this and they never ask me about it.

It just seems counter intuitive. It is easier to escape the side control of a featherweight than an ultraweavy weoght using the same force.


I know this seems stupid but it is a fair common sense question:

Hey moon, how come you come you act stronger on the ocean then you do on the lake or stream.


Fair?

The actual amount of shift is a matter of relativity. Perhaps you misunderstand how vast oceans are. The couple feet of tide difference in the ocean is the same as a few centimeters in the Great Lakes.

Here - learn a thing:

https://curiosity.com/topics/why-do-tides-happen-in-oceans-and-not-lakes-curiosity/

[Diode]

Also... concerning the moon:


Why are the craters perfectly round.
How as Nixon able to call the moon and our cellphones can’t work in elevators?

They are not "perfectly round"
Elevators are gigantic faraday cages.

[veritas]

The actual amount of shift is a matter of relativity. Perhaps you misunderstand how vast oceans are. The couple feet of tide difference in the ocean is the same as a few centimeters in the Great Lakes.

Here - learn a thing:

https://curiosity.com/topics/why-do-tides-happen-in-oceans-and-not-lakes-curiosity/

That was interesting and a good explanation. Fair enough. I was just curious about the moon, and that didn’t add up to me, but now I understand. Thank you.

[veritas]

Is it true we only see one side of the moon because the earth is always spinning in front of it?

[Diode]

Is it true we only see one side of the moon because the earth is always spinning in front of it?

https://www.space.com/24871-does-the-moon-rotate.html

Honestly, thank you for taking the time to learn things.

[veritas]

https://www.space.com/24871-does-the-moon-rotate.html

Honestly, thank you for taking the time to learn things.

No problem. I like to ask questions and think about things.

[veritas]

https://www.space.com/24871-does-the-moon-rotate.html

Honestly, thank you for taking the time to learn things.

Ok so the rotation is synchronous. How then do meteorites strike it and cause the craters if the earth is always in front of it?

Does my question make sense?

[Diode]

Ok so the rotation is synchronous. How then do meteorites strike it and cause the craters if the earth is always in front of it?

Does my question make sense?

The moon is 238,900 mi from the Earth.

[veritas]

So the meteorites curve around the earth and then hit the moon flush like a bullet from the movie Wanted? I mean I guess that could happen...?

[~RustyGunZ~]

https://i.imgur.com/gcmVbxd.jpg

[Diode]

So the meteorites curve around the earth and then hit the moon flush like a bullet from the movie Wanted? I mean I guess that could happen...?

The universe is 3 dimensional. Not sure what you're getting at.

Though not relevant here, gravitational slingshots are constantly used for space travel, so what you are describing can and does happen frequently.

[veritas]

https://i.imgur.com/gcmVbxd.jpg

This is perfect. I drew something similar. Which is back to my other question. If the meteorites come in on angles then shouldn’t there be jagged edges on the moon? And not just perfect cercular craters? As if it was always being hit flush and not an angle?

I know this may seem stupid to you, but I have been ok a quest lately of re examining my understanding of reality and I find that there are things that don’t make sense.

Also: how is the moon a sphere yet it is the same brightness on the edges when a full moon? It should be darker on the edges. Fair?

[Diode]

This is perfect. I drew something similar. Which is back to my other question. If the meteorites come in on angles then shouldn’t there be jagged edges on the moon? And not just perfect cercular craters? As if it was always being hit flush and not an angle?

I know this may seem stupid to you, but I have been ok a quest lately of re examining my understanding of reality and I find that there are things that don’t make sense.

Also: how is the moon a sphere yet it is the same brightness on the edges when a full moon? It should be darker on the edges. Fair?

Whew, a lot to unpack here.

First and foremost - craters are not perfect circles. I don't know where you are getting this from but we need to get this resolved that before we move forward. A simple Google search will prove this wrong:

https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&ei=AYKaXLbiMoOOggeCkpTYAQ&q=moon+craters&oq=moon+craters&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0l10.6403.7978..8061...0.0..0.97.900.12....2 ..0....1..gws-wiz.......0i71j35i39j0i273j0i67j0i131j0i131i67j0i2 0i263.TPs6y0ZuNgA

They are of various size, relief, and shape. Accept this and I'll answer any follow ups you have on it. You can (and should) watch videos of meteors striking the moon. It happens regularly.

To your second question: Do you have a full understanding of how the phases of the moon work? They are simply shadows, the moon itself is not actually changing in any way. The luminosity simply changes based off of how much shadow is covering the moon.

[veritas]

Just looked at your images and they seem to prove my point. The meteors are not perfect circles and they are. Supposedly hitting the moon on angles. Coming in between earth and moon. This doesn’t make sense to me sir.

I am not trolling you. Just asking reasonable questions.


I understand the luminosity of the moon. It is still a luninous sphere and when it is full why are the edges as bright as the center. That is not consistent with other observable phenomenon.

[Diode]

Just looked at your images and they seem to prove my point. The meteors are not perfect circles and they are. Supposedly hitting the moon on angles. Coming in between earth and moon. This doesn’t make sense to me sir.

I am not trolling you. Just asking reasonable questions.


I understand the luminosity of the moon. It is still a luninous sphere and when it is full why are the edges as bright as the center. That is not consistent with other observable phenomenon.

1) "The meteors are not perfect circles and they are." ??? what

2) https://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/1622/why-is-the-outline-of-a-crescent-moon-brighter

See second response. Same concept. Illusion.

[~RustyGunZ~]

https://i.imgur.com/yaNCJKP.jpg

For you to see on a flat view of the surface something that isn't close to perfectly round, impact would need to be at an angle where the meteor would drag on the surface ( I think this is what you're looking for, why aren't the impact areas longer dragged out marks ).

You're not going to see anything aside from the impact point, which will usually be at least somewhat round. You don't see it's continuation after impact because it's under the surface.

[veritas]

Knuck said it better than me.


The holes on the moon do not match what common sense tells me should happen if the meteorites were hitting it like you said they were, Chris.

[veritas]

The solar eclipse also seems impossible to me.

[~RustyGunZ~]

Knuck said it better than me.


The holes on the moon do not match what common sense tells me should happen if the meteorites were hitting it like you said they were, Chris.

If I said what you meant better than you were saying, why are you still confused?

Make a ball of dirt and shoot it with a BB gun from multiple angles, and then look at the impacts by holding it directly in front of you from some distance. You’ll see they all end up being round. Any that somehow hit the perfect angle to create drag will look more like scuffs and not register as even being points of impacts if you were looking at it as the moon.

If diode can’t find some document to back what I’m saying I might go make an experiment and proof for science

[veritas]

Then maybe I misunderstood you. I apologize.


I am saying that everyone of those pictures of the craters look like round circles. How would that happen if the moon was hit from angles?

[veritas]

If I said what you meant better than you were saying, why are you still confused?

Make a ball of dirt and shoot it with a BB gun from multiple angles, and then look at the impacts by holding it directly in front of you from some distance. You’ll see they all end up being round. Any that somehow hit the perfect angle to create drag will look more like scuffs and not register as even being points of impacts if you were looking at it as the moon.

If diode can’t find some document to back what I’m saying I might go make an experiment and proof for science

Shooting a bb into a dirt ball would not be an equal comparison of force I am afraid.


Edit: but still try o want to see. I am just asking questions.

[~RustyGunZ~]

Shooting a bb into a dirt ball would not be an equal comparison of force I am afraid.


Edit: but still try o want to see. I am just asking questions.

It would be enough so to make sense of what I’m saying, but I could simulate other types of force and angles.

[veritas]

Why are the edges of the full moon as bright as the center of the moon ?

And if you think about it, the solar eclipse seems pretty impossible

[Diode]

Why are the edges of the full moon as bright as the center of the moon ?

And if you think about it, the solar eclipse seems pretty impossible

I already answered this.

[~RustyGunZ~]

Why are the edges of the full moon as bright as the center of the moon ?

And if you think about it, the solar eclipse seems pretty impossible

Have you looked into the solar eclipse at all?

I appreciate diode linking you to stuff, but a lot of this is easy to find yourself.

Not being condescending, have you ever taken a physics course?

[veritas]

Yes and no respectively. But I have studied some physics on my own .

[~RustyGunZ~]

Yes and no respectively. But I have studied some physics on my own .

I can send you the textbook I’ve used in both 1 and 2. The first unit should clear up why acceleration and angle aren’t what you think they are in terms of impact.

[~RustyGunZ~]

http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/our-solar-system/38-our-solar-system/the-earth/impacts/47-why-are-craters-round-beginner

That provides a tldr and link to an extensive scientific study.

[veritas]

I can send you the textbook I’ve used in both 1 and 2. The first unit should clear up why acceleration and angle aren’t what you think they are in terms of impact.

Thank you for the gesture. I texted you my addy

[Pharaohs Army]

Whew, a lot to unpack here.

[Pharaohs Army]

Also... concerning the moon:


Why are the craters perfectly round.
How as Nixon able to call the moon and our cellphones can’t work in elevators?

Seriously though.
I saw that recently, that Nixon called the moon.
This was before cell phones.
How is that possible?
Anybody?

[Split Eight]

Veritas shotgun pump video to thread

[Diode]

Veritas shotgun pump video to thread

a wild split appears!

[veritas]

a wild split appears!

I think that the math behind the lunar eclipse either proves a Divine orchestration, or perhaps we have been lied to.

I mean what are the chances that at that exact time frame, the sun which is 400x larger than the moon is also 400x farther away from it to cover it perfectly?

Also...nevermind.

[Diode]

it doesn't cover it perfectly? the shadow is larger than the moon.

[veritas]

I said it the other way around my bad. How is the moon able to cast a perfect shadow over the sun.

That is what I meant
?

[uh-oh]

I said it the other way around my bad. How is the moon able to cast a perfect shadow over the sun.

That is what I meant
?

It doesnt. Thats why you arent supposed to look at the eclipse without welding type level glass goggles

[YDK]

It doesnt. Thats why you arent supposed to look at the eclipse without welding type level glass goggles

He clearly didn't abide by that, hence the melted brain

[Split Eight]

a wild split appears!

https://www.gifimage.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/zach-galifianakis-nodding-gif-4.gif