View Full Version : I prove man on man anal isn’t gay
Premise 1: Being dominant isn’t gay. Premise 2: Being gay is being attracted to the traits of the same gender. Premise 3: When fucking a man, I and most other straight alphas aren’t sexually enjoying or attracted to the act. We are merely asserting our dominance. Conclusion: Fucking men in their tight, juicy assholes isn’t gay.
the Munster
01-14-2020, 04:51 PM
And y’all swear I’m the one that’s retarded for giving sound advice on lowering your tax bill tho
And y’all swear I’m the one that’s retarded for giving sound advice on lowering your tax bill tho
I’m a genius. I literally proved this using only the second premise. I could make another easily. AND it’s a flawless argument
Pakistani Hand Cannon
01-14-2020, 06:02 PM
Premise 2: Being gay is being attracted to the traits of the same gender.
No. It'd be more about that "attraction" being sexually stimulating for you. Something can be attractive without provoking a sexual response.
Use better logic.
On another note...why do niggas literally talk about anything/everything here except hiphop?
No. It'd be more about that "attraction" being sexually stimulating for you. Something can be attractive without provoking a sexual response.
Use better logic.
On another note...why do niggas literally talk about anything/everything here except hiphop?
Gayness extends beyond the realms of Sexuality. An action can be gay without a party being sexually stimulated. Furthermore, my use of ‘attraction’ applies to all sexual stimulation, so the point is invalid and doesn’t disprove my argument.
Pakistani Hand Cannon
01-14-2020, 06:19 PM
Gayness extends beyond the realms of Sexuality.
In the context you initially used the term. No it does not.
You're done here.
Pharaohs Army
01-14-2020, 07:21 PM
Premise 1: Being dominant isn’t gay. Premise 2: Being gay is being attracted to the traits of the same gender. Premise 3: When fucking a man, I and most other straight alphas aren’t sexually enjoying or attracted to the act. We are merely asserting our dominance. Conclusion: Fucking men in their tight, juicy assholes isn’t gay.
Fuck you, faggot.
Sinacog
01-14-2020, 07:31 PM
Anal is for gays, DMS.
dull boy
01-14-2020, 08:25 PM
Discussion is basically a hip hop 4chan.
In the context you initially used the term. No it does not.
You're done here.
Bet, but also irrelevant
Blue Bayou
01-14-2020, 09:58 PM
I accept you
Answer
01-14-2020, 10:21 PM
Premise 1 is the problem tho. You can be dominant and gay. The reason the terms tops and bottoms exist is because someone has to be on top. Case in point, Sinacog is gay and been dominating the text scene for a couple years now
Premise 1 is the problem tho. You can be dominant and gay. The reason the terms tops and bottoms exist is because someone has to be on top. Case in point, Sinacog is gay and been dominating the text scene for a couple years now
While I literally didn’t base my conclusion from premise 1 at all, someone being gay and dominant isn’t dominance in and of itself being gay. It’s like if I said “Being read doesn’t make you a car” and you said “But cars can be read.” I understand where you are coming from, but if I were to argue from premise 1, I would state that fucking a man is purely for dominance, which in and of itself isn’t gay, and that is all that is going on while I’m thrusting balls deep into a man’s Virgin rectum.
Tl;dr i could remove premise 1 and still come to my conclusion
Pharaohs Army
01-14-2020, 11:04 PM
You're a fucking faggot who apparently is fucking faggots
Ahh obv I hit up the wrong thread...
vBulletin® v3.8.5, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.