the official top battler list. boredome and allen knight step inside.

[Scott Akers]

BoredomAllen Knight

http://i47.tinypic.com/1zwhmco.png

u guys battle for the award, or win another battle lol.

[~RustyGunZ~]

i'm not on here and how is 2-anything not 0 better than 2-0 lol

[Scott Akers]

ur under me u just got cut off, i can also do this by win percentage to

[God Of War]

i kind of agree i mean a dude with 26 wins but 300 losses shouldnt be better then a dude with 25 wins n 0 losses

[Split]

ya gotta do a weighted average or something


also, can the AOWL get some sort of mention, considering it's roughly the same size as the AOBL, as well as the best active topical league on the internet?

[God Of War]

I AGREE WITH THAT TO DIA.. I KNOW U DOIG ALOT BRO BUT SHOW some love to the topicals to my g

[bleak]

bronze. I feel like I shouldn't be there tho

[Scott Akers]

that query is based on the battle hack and those battles arent on the battle hack.

[Allen Knight]

id be 8-1 right now but b2b aint done

[Scott Akers]

boredom says hes got 9

[~RustyGunZ~]

just delete the battlehack and do it manually

i will gladly do it if you don't want to this site isn't active enough to make it much of a chore

[Allen Knight]

ok w/e idc lol im just sayin i champed everything so far & im in the b2b finals too

[Hollywood]

how is 5-3 & 5-4 better than 5-0?

shame on you

[Hollywood]

good stuff though for puttin in work

[Scott Akers]

how is 5-3 & 5-4 better than 5-0?

shame on you

cause this shitty system doesn't have a win percentage column lol.

[Scott Akers]

just delete the battlehack and do it manually

i will gladly do it if you don't want to this site isn't active enough to make it much of a chore
um I will put mine up before I delete the battle hack.

manual battle stats aren't accurate, you shouldn't have control over it.

[Sharp]

i'm not on here and how is 2-anything not 0 better than 2-0 lol

Yeah I'm seeing 2-3 2-2 2-0 in no particular order

That ain't quite right yet, props on the list tho

[PancakeBrah]

I beat Allen Knight in a pic battle before I had dickriders/anyone knew who I was.

Swept him.


EDIT-

Also in a Fight Night. One of the three I participated in.

[Scott Akers]

man this one don't even have KO's lol.

[Sharp]

Shit I was slow as fuck with that response lol, posting from the phone

Ignore my shit

[~RustyGunZ~]

um I will put mine up before I delete the battle hack.

manual battle stats aren't accurate, you shouldn't have control over it.

i did them on nc for like a year never heard a complaint

and how are they not accurate?

so ak is 9-1

how is it hard to compile his battles and come to that fact

[Scott Akers]

because you always have control over it, if its automatic, then you don't, and its more true.

manual is so 99 though, if you do that midaswell bring back crews and long bar battles.

and there was always complaints on nc's about the top battler list not being updated.

there list was ordered by wins to.

[Strikta]

Take me off this list yo, I don't battle for records n shit like dat.

[Scott Akers]

you'll be knocked off anyway when people start battling more

[Brass Body]

I battle for power, not rank.

[~RustyGunZ~]

dia nc was 300x as active as this site and only lama did the list itself we couldn't touch that

[Scott Akers]

you said no one complained about it, there was a thread every other day about how it needed to be updated, all could have been avoided if they did the same shit but automatic, this is no different than listing the shit your self, if its manual you can have a speculated list, which is wrong, it has to be real not speculation.

anything you can do on this shit can be automated.

[Strikta]

Dia got me confused w/ someone that giva fuck.

lol

[Split]

how are you going to tell topical wins apart from text battle wins?

[Scott Akers]

if you don't give a fuck then why you got multiple post in this thread.

[Scott Akers]

how are you going to tell topical wins apart from text battle wins?

you can't really in this system, on mine its broken down in categories or w/e

[Strikta]

What does having multiple posts in this thread have anything to do w/ me giving a fuck about a battle record, u reaching fucking moronicus?

[Boredom]

should be 11-3 atm, whats the deal with this tho Diasick

[Scott Akers]

im not in charge of updating records, but im working to get the stats category based Boredom

[Sn00p]

should be 11-3 atm, whats the deal with this tho Diasick

Tournament Records get updated after the tourney's finished. That's probably the reason.

[Boredom]

oh no word Sn00p i know that, i was talking about this whole thread and award title shit?

[Scott Akers]

im going to work with what we have tho. no since in starting over.

[Boredom]

what is the award or w.e Diasick

[Dominate]

It should be sorted by #wins - #losses, then by most wins

[Scott Akers]

It should be sorted by #wins - #losses, then by most wins

that's win percentage.

[Dominate]

No it's not.

Win percentage is #wins/#battles x 100

Compare these 2 records: 4-1 (win percentage 80%) and 11-3 (win percentage 79%)

Personally I think 11-3 is more impressive and should be ranked higher than 4-1

With my system it is, with win percentage it's not

[Dominate]

Also if you sort by win percentage first then 1-0 will beat 99-1
If you sort by #wins first then 99-98 will beat 98-0

My system is better

[Scott Akers]

No it's not.

Win percentage is #wins/#battles x 100

Compare these 2 records: 4-1 (win percentage 80%) and 11-3 (win percentage 79%)

Personally I think 11-3 is more impressive and should be ranked higher than 4-1

With my system it is, with win percentage it's not

dude the calculations will come out the same both ways, 11-3 will always out rank 4-1 on a win percentage bases, and win percentage would put someone at 99-58 below someone thats 30-0, which is legit to me. 30-0 is more impressive than 99-58.

[Dominate]

They wot come out the same- I just showed you: 4-1 is 80% wins, 11-3 is 79%, so by win percentage 4-1 will beat 11-3

And yes 99-58 maybe shouldn't outrank 30-0, but it's more outrageous for 1-0 to outrank 20-1 which is what would happen going by win percent. And those are much more likely figures than yours. My system isn't perfect but it's def better than win percent

[Scott Akers]

its better to go by number of vets beat tho, because 99 could mean that 98 of those came from newbies. but thats a different beast and isn't neccessary.

thats the ric flair system.

#tobethemanyougottabeattheman

[Dominate]

Yeah I agree... it would be good to have beating a better writer do more for your rank than beating a nobody... but then you have complications like if the vet got lazy and dropped a wack verse or w/e/... and at the end of the day these rankings are just a guide - people know who is ill and who isn't...